Science & Justice
Volume 46, Issue 1 , Pages 25-31 , January 2006

Logical evaluation of evidence when a person is suspected of committing two separate offences

  • I.W. Evett

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Science Service, 109 Lambeth Road, London SE1 7LP, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence.
    • ,
  • G. Jackson

      Affiliations

    • Advance Forensic Science, Suite 121, 17 Union Street, Dundee DD1 5BG, UK
    • Work carried out while employed by the Forensic Science Service.
    • ,
  • D.V. Lindley

      Affiliations

    • “Woodstock”, Quay Lane, Minehead, Somerset TA24 5QU, UK
    • ,
  • D. Meuwly

      Affiliations

    • Nederlands Forensisch Instituut, Room B308, P.O. Box 24044, 2490AA The Hague
    • Work carried out while employed by the Forensic Science Service.

Received 5 March 2005 ,Accepted 6 January 2006.

References 

  1. Doheny and Adams (1997) 1 Cr. App. R 369.
  2. Wells GL, Olson EA. Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology. 2003;54:277–295

PII: S1355-0306(06)71564-7

doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71564-7

Science & Justice
Volume 46, Issue 1 , Pages 25-31 , January 2006

Article Tools