Science & Justice
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 205-213 , October 2006

Forensic Individualisation from Biometric Data

Received 13 June 2003 ,Accepted 10 June 2006.

References 

  1. McRoberts FS. Mills S, and Possley M Forensics under the Microscope, Unproven Techniques Sway Courts, Erode Justice, in Chicago Tribune, 2004: Chicago.
  2. Stacey R. A report on the Erroneous Fingerprint Individualization in the Madrid Train Bombing Case. Journal of Forensic Identification. 2004;54(6):706–718
  3. Kirk P. The Ontogeny of Criminalistics. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 1963;54:235–238
  4. Kwan Q. Inference of Identity of Source. Department of Forensic Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 1977;p. 179
  5. Locard E. L’ldentification des Récidivistes. Paris: A. Maloine; 1909;
  6. Tuthill H. Individualization: Principles and Procedures in Criminalistics. Salem: Lightning Powder Co.; 1994;
  7. Taroni F. La Recherche et la Gestion des Liens dans I’Investigation Criminelle: Une Etape vers I’Exploitation Systématique des Données de Police. Institut de Police Scientifique et de Criminologie. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne; 1997;p. 253
  8. Evett I. Expert Evidence and Forensic Misconceptions of the Nature of Exact Science. Science and Justice. 1996;36(2):118–122
  9. Champod C, Meuwty D. The Inference of Identity in Forensic Speaker Recognition. Speech Communication. 2000;31(2-3):193–203
  10. Champod C, Evett I. A Probabilistic Approach to Fingerprint Evidence. Journal of Forensic Identification. 2001;51(2):101–122
  11. Locard E. Policiers de Roman et Policiers de Laboratoire. Paris: Payot; 1924;
  12. Eco U. The Name of the Rose. 1st ed.. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1983;
  13. Verdan A. Karl Popper ou la Connaissance Sans Certitude. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes; 1991;
  14. Doddington G. Speaker Recognition - Identify People by their Voices. Proc. IEEE. 1985;73(11):1651
  15. Bolt R, et al. Speaker Identification by Speech Spectrograms: A Scientists’ View of its Reliability for Legal Purposes. J. Acoustic. Soc. Am. 1970;47(2):597–612
  16. Grieve D. Built by many hands. Fingerprint Whorld. 2000;26(100):51–60
  17. Nolan F. Forensic Phonetics. Journal of Linguistics. 1991;27:483–493
  18. Clifford B. Voice Identification by Human Listeners: on Earwitness Reliability. Law and human behaviour. 1980;4(4):373–394
  19. Boves L Commercial Applications of Speaker Verification: Overview and Critical Success Factors. in RLA2C Workshop: Speaker Recognition and its Commercial and Forensic Applications. 1998. Avignon.
  20. Marquis P Sur les Preuves non Déductives en Intelligence Artificielle, in :(Ed.), 1999, in Le Concept de Preuve à la Lumière de I’Intelligence Artificielle, S. J and J. Szczeciniarz Editors. 1999, Presses Universitaires de France: Paris, p. 139–158.
  21. Conan Doyle A. The Sign of Four. The Complete Sherlock Holmes. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.; 1953;p. 91–155
  22. Truzzi M. Sherlock Holmes. In:  Eco U,  Sebeok TA editor. The sign of three. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1983;p. 55–80
  23. Stoney DA. What Made Us ever Think We Could Individualize Using Statistics. Journal of The Forensic Science Society. 1991;31(2):197–199
  24. Taroni F, Champod C, Margot P. Forerunners of Bayesianism in Early Forensic Science. Jurimetrics Journal. 1998;38:183–200
  25. Evett I. Toward a Uniform Framework for Reporting Opinions in Forensic Science Casework. Science & Justice. 1998;38(3):198–202
  26. Champod C, Margot P. Computer Assisted Analysis of Minutiæ Occurences on Fingerprints. In:  Almog J,  Springer E editor. International Symposium on Fingerprint Detection and Identification. Israel National Police: Ne’urim, Israel; 1995;p. 305–31826–30 June 1995
  27. Meuwly D. Reconnaissance de Locuteurs en Sciences Forensiques: I’Apport d’une Approche Automatique. Institut de Police Scientifique et Criminologie. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne; 2001;p. 272
  28. Champod C, Evett I. Earmarks as Evidence: A Critical Review. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2001;46(6):1275–1284
  29. Bremermann H. What Mathematics Can and Cannot Do for Pattern Recognition. In: O’Grusser  editors. Pattern Recognition in Biological and Technical Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1971;
  30. Thévenaz P. Résidu de Prédiction Linéaire et Reconnaisance de Locuteurs Independante du Texte. Switzerland: University of Neuchâtel; 1993;

PII: S1355-0306(06)71600-8

doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71600-8

Science & Justice
Volume 46, Issue 4 , Pages 205-213 , October 2006