Science & Justice
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 19-23 , May 2007

A survey of the incidence of missing anterior teeth: Potential value in bite mark analysis

Received 7 November 2005 ,Accepted 25 May 2006.

References 

  1. British Association for Forensic Odontology Guidelines for Good Practice in Bite Mark Investigations and Analysis, 2004.
  2. Kelly M, Steele JG, Nuttall N, Bradnock G, Morris J, Nunn J, et al. Adult Dental Health Survey: Oral Health in the United Kingdom, 1998. London: TSO; 2000;
  3. Aboshi H, Taylor JA, Brown KA. Comparison of bitemarks in foodstuffs by computer imaging: a case report. J. Forensic Odonto-stomatol. 1994;12:41–44
  4. Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ, Zion GR. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988–1991. J. Dent. Res. 1996;75:684–695
  5. Hand JS, Hunt RJ, Kohout FJ. Five-year incidence of tooth loss in Iowans aged 65 and older. J. Commun. Dent. Oral Epidemiol. 1991;19:48–54
  6. Dorion RBJ, Sourviron RR. Patterns, lesions and trauma-mimicking bite marks. In:  Dorion RBJ editors. Bite Mark Evidence. Marcel Dekker; 2005;p. 389–413
  7. Bernstein ML. Nature of bite marks. In:  Dorion RBJ editors. Bite Mark Evidence. Marcel Dekker; 2005;p. 59–80
  8. Rawson RD, Ommen RK, Kinard G, Johnson J, Yfantis A. Statistical evidence for the individuality of the human dentition. J. Forensic Sci. 1984;29:245–253
  9. Pretty IA, Sweet D. The scientific basis foe human bitemark analyses—critical review. Sci. Justice. 2001;41:85–92

PII: S1355-0306(07)00004-4

doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2006.05.001

Science & Justice
Volume 47, Issue 1 , Pages 19-23 , May 2007