Science & Justice
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 16-23, March 2008

Determination of mouth alcohol using the Dräger Evidential Portable Alcohol System

  • Chancy C. Fessler

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Sciences Program, University of California, Davis, United States
  • ,
  • Frederic A. Tulleners

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Sciences Program, University of California, Davis, United States
  • ,
  • David G. Howitt

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Sciences Program, University of California, Davis, United States
  • ,
  • John R. Richards

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Davis, California Medical Center, PSSB 2100, 2315 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 916 734 1537; fax: +1 916 7347950.

Received 14 March 2007; received in revised form 2 August 2007; accepted 10 August 2007. published online 17 September 2007.

Abstract 

Drivers suspected of alcohol intoxication are observed for a period of 15 min prior to quantitative breath alcohol testing. This is to preclude the interference of alcohol-based substances such as cough medicine, mouthwash, and breath spray just prior to actual evidential testing. To determine whether a 15 min observation period was necessary when performing evidential breath tests in the field, a mouth alcohol experiment was performed using the Dräger Evidential Portable Alcohol System (EPAS). Five types of alcohol beverages and the effects of expectorating versus swallowing were tested on twenty-five volunteer subjects. Serial measurements of breath and blood alcohol levels were performed at fixed time intervals. All alcohol beverage types gave two sequential measurements within 0.02 g/210 L of each other before 15 min had passed. Fifteen minutes was necessary to ensure there was no residual mouth alcohol. If the 15 min waiting period was not observed, the safety feature of the EPAS requiring two sequential measurements 2 min apart within 0.02 g/210 L would not ensure against mouth alcohol interference.

Keywords: Mouth, Breath, Alcohol, Ethanol, Alcotest

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the January 2006 meeting of the California Association of Toxicologists, and in June 2005 to the Graduate Forensic Science Program at the University of California, Davis. Partially funded by a grant from the California Association of Toxicologists.

PII: S1355-0306(07)00067-6

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2007.08.004

Science & Justice
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 16-23, March 2008