Science & Justice
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 24-28, March 2008

Nature and place of crime scene management within forensic sciences

Criminal Investigation Department of the Gendarmerie Nationale (SR), Quartier Beteille, 33270 Bouliac, France

Accepted 26 September 2007. published online 29 October 2007.

Abstract 

This short paper presents the preliminary results of a recent study aimed at appreciating the relevant parameters required to qualify forensic science as a science through an epistemological analysis. The reader is invited to reflect upon references within a historical and logical framework which assert that forensic science is based upon two fundamental principles (those of Locard and Kirk). The basis of the assertion that forensic science is indeed a science should be appreciated not only on one epistemological criteria (as Popper's falsification raised by the Daubert hearing was), but also on the logical frameworks used by the individuals involved (investigator, expert witness and trier of fact) from the crime scene examination to the final interpretation of the evidence. Hence, it can be argued that the management of the crime scene should be integrated into the scientific way of thinking rather than remain as a technical discipline as recently suggested by Harrison.

Keywords: Forensic sciences, Crime scene investigation, Epistemology, Scientificity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1355-0306(07)00097-4

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2007.09.009

Science & Justice
Volume 48, Issue 1 , Pages 24-28, March 2008