Science & Justice
Volume 48, Issue 4 , Pages 178-181, December 2008

Experimental design for acquiring relevant data to address the issue of comparing consecutively manufactured tools and firearms

  • John Buckleton

      Affiliations

    • ESR, Mount Albert Science Centre, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Chris Triggs

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Franco Taroni

      Affiliations

    • Institut de Police Scientifique et de Criminologie, Université of Lausanne, B.C.H.,1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Christophe Champod

      Affiliations

    • Institut de Police Scientifique et de Criminologie, Université of Lausanne, B.C.H.,1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Gerhard Wevers

      Affiliations

    • ESR, Mount Albert Science Centre, Private Bag 92021, Auckland, New Zealand

Received 9 October 2007; received in revised form 12 February 2008; accepted 20 February 2008. published online 22 May 2008.

Abstract 

The comparison of consecutively manufactured tools and firearms has provided much, but not all, of the basis for the profession of firearm and toolmark examination. The authors accept the fundamental soundness of this approach but appeal to the experimental community to close two minor gaps in the experimental procedure. We suggest that “blinding” and attention to appropriateness of other experimental conditions that would consolidate the foundations of our profession. We do not suggest that previous work is unsound.

Keywords: Blind studies, Consecutively manufactured tools, Experimental design, Toolmark examination

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1355-0306(08)00032-4

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2008.02.001

Science & Justice
Volume 48, Issue 4 , Pages 178-181, December 2008