Are facial image analysis experts any better than the general public at identifying individuals from CCTV images?

References 

1. Frith M. Four million CCTV cameras watch public. In: The Independent. January 12 2004;
2. L. Bowie, S. Plews and M. Bromby. When evidence is a question of image. Law Gazette; 13 May 2004.
3. Gerrard G, Parkins G, Cunningham I, Jones W, Hill S, Douglas S. National CCTV Strategy. Home Office; October 2007;
4. Henderson Z, Bruce V, Burton M. Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2001;15(4):445–464
5. Davies G, Thasen S. Closed-circuit television: how effective an identification aid?. British Journal of Psychology. 2000;91(3):411–426
6. Bruce V, Henderson Z, Newman C, Burton M. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied. 2001;7(3):207–218
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Keval HU, Sasse MA. Can we ID from CCTV?. In: Image quality in digital CCTV and facial identification performance. Proc SPIE. vol. 6982:March 19 2008;
8. Burton M, Wilson S, Cowan C, Bruce V. Face recognition in poor-quality video. Psychological Science. 1999;10(3):243–248
9. Attorney General's reference No 2 0f 2002 (2003) EWCA crim 2373.
10. Bertillion A. In:  McClaughry RW editors. The Bertillion system of identification. Chicago: The Werner company; 1896;
11. Halberstein RA. The application of anthropometric indices in forensic photography; three case studies. Journal of Forest Science. 2001;46(6):1438–1441
12. Porter G, Doran G. The application of forensic photography for facial identification methods. Imaging Science Journal. 1998;46:175–176
13. Iscan MY. Introduction of techniques for photographic comparison: potential and problems. In:  Iscan MY,  Helmer RP editor. Cpt 3: Forensic Analysis of the Skull. New York: Wiley-Liss Publishers; 1993;
14. Porter G, Doran G. An anatomical and photographic technique for forensic facial identification. Forest Science-International. 2000;114:97–105
15. Catterick . Facial measurements as an aid to recognition. Forest Science-International. 1992;56(1):23–27
16. Mardia KV, Coombes A, Kirkbride J, Linney A, Bowie JL. On statistical problems with face identification from photographs. Journal of Applied Statistics. 1996;23:655–675
17. Kleinberg KF, Vanezis P, Burton AM. Failure of anthropometry as a facial identification technique using high-quality photographs. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2007;52:779–783
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. FIAG membership details 2007.
19. R-v- Ryan 1991, unreported.
20. R-v-Stockwell, 1993, 97 Court of Appeals, R. 260.
21. Court of Appeal, No.2002/2459/X3, 27 March, 2003.
22. Ellis HD, Sheperd JW, Davies GM. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception. 1979;8:431–439
    • MEDLINE
23. I.N. Jarudi and P. Sinha. Relative contributions of internal and external features to face recognition. A1 Memo 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Artificial Intelligence laboratory.
24. Dror IE, Rosenthal R. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2008;53(4):900–903
    • CrossRef