A preliminary investigation into the use of testate amoebae for the discrimination of forensic soil samples

References 

1. Marumo Y, Sugita R. Validity of colour examination for forensic soil identification. Forensic Science International. 1996;83:201–210
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (1452 KB)
   • CrossRef
2. Ruffell A, Wiltshire P. Conjunctive use of quantitative and qualitative X-ray diffraction analysis of soils and rocks for forensic analysis. Forensic Science International. 2004;145:13–23
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (754 KB)
   • CrossRef
3. Cabriola N, Pommier MT, Gueux M, Payen G. Comparison of lipid composition in two types of human peutrfactive liquid. Forensic Science International. 1998;94:47–54
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (199 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Marumo Y, Sugita R. Screening of soil evidence by a combination of simple techniques: validity of particle size distribution. Forensic Science International. 2001;122:155–158
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (64 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Horrocks M, Coulson SA, Walsh KAJ. Forensic palynology: variation in the pollen content of soil on shoes and in shoeprints in soil. Journal of Forensic Science. 1999;44:119–122
6. Murray R. Evidence from the Earth. Missoula, Montana: Mountain Press Publishing Co; 2004;
7. Croft DJ, Pye K. Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation. Science and Justice. 2004;44:21–28
8. Bull PA, Parker A, Morgan RM. The forensic analysis of soils and sediment taken from the cast of a footprint. Forensic Science International. 2006;162:6–12
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (1336 KB)
   • CrossRef
9. Woodland WA, Charman DJ, Sims PC. Quantitative estimates of water tables and soil moisture in Holocene peatlands from testate amoebae. The Holocene. 1998;8:261–273
10. Chardez D. Thecamoebologie et expertises juridiques. In: Travaille Laboratoire Unitie Zoologique Géneral Applice Facultie Science Agricole. vol. 22:Gembloux; 1990;
11. Lambert J, Chardez D. Intérêt criminalistique de la microfaune terrestre. Revue Internationale de Police criminelle. 1978;319:158–170
12. Gunn A. Essential Forensic Biology: Animals, Plants and Microorganisms in Legal Investigations. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2006;
13. Committee on Systematics and Evolution of the Society of Protozoologists. A newly revised classification of the Protozoa. Journal of Protozoology. 1980;27:37–58
14. Mitchell EAD, Charman DJ, Warner BG. Testate amoebae analysis in ecological and paleoecological studies of wetlands: past, present and future. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2008;17:2115–2137
15. Charman DJ, Hendon D, Woodland WA. The Identification of Testate Amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in Peats. London: Quaternary Research Association Technical Guide; 2000;
16. Charman DJ. Biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental applications of testate amoebae. Quaternary Science Reviews. 2001;20:1753–1764
17. Charman DJ. Testate amoebae and the fossil record: issues in biodiversity. Journal of Biogeography. 1999;26:89–96
18. Ogden CG. Observations on clonal cultures of Euglyphidae (Rhizopodea, Protozoa). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology). 1981;41:137–151
19. Heal OW. Observations on the seasonal and spatial distribution of Testacea (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in Sphagnum. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1964;33:395–412
20. Patterson RT, Kumar A. A review of current testate rhizopod (thecamoebian) research in Canada. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology. 2002;180:225–251
21. Charman DJ, Roe HM, Gehrels WR. Modern distribution of saltmarsh testate amoebae: regional variability of zonation and response to environmental variables. Journal of Quaternary Science. 2002;17:387–409
22. Wiltshire PEJ. Consideration of some taphonomic variables of relevance to forensic palynological investigation in the United Kingdom. Forensic Science International. 2006;163:173–182
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (180 KB)
    • CrossRef
23. Grospietsch T. Wechseltierchen (Rhizopoden). Stuttgart: Kosmos Verlag; 1958;
24. Corbet SA. An illustrated introduction to the testate rhizopods in Sphagnum, with special reference to area around Malham Tarn, Yorkshire. Field Studies. 1973;3:801–838
25. Ogden CG, Hedley RH. An Atlas to Freshwater Testate Amoebae. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1980;
26. Ellison RL, Ogden CG. A guide to the study and identification of fossil testate amoebae in Quaternary sediments. In: Quaternary Sediments, Internationale Revue der Gesamten, Hydrobiologie. vol. 72:1987;p. 639–652
27. Schulte EE, Hopkins BG. Estimation of organic matter by weight loss-on-ignition. In:  Magdoff FR,  Tabatasbai MA,  Hanlon EA editor. Soil Organic Matter: Analysis and Interpretation. SSSA Special Publication. vol. 46:Madison, WI: SSSA; 1996;p. 21–31
28. Patterson RT, Fishbein E. Re-examination of the statistical methods used to determine the number of point counts needed for micropaleontological quantitative research. Journal of Paleontology. 1989;63:245–248
29. Swindles GT, Roe HM. Examining the dissolution characteristics of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) in low pH conditions: implications for peatland palaeoclimate studies. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2007;252:486–496
30. Mildenhall DC, Wiltshire PEJ, Bryant VM. Forensic palynology: why do it and how it works. Forensic Science International. 2006;163:163–172
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (178 KB)
    • CrossRef
31. Hendon D, Charman DJ. The preparation of testate amoebae (Protozoa: Rhizopoda) samples from peat. The Holocene. 1997;7:199–205
32. Stockmarr J. Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen et Spores. 1971;13:615–621