Science & Justice
Volume 49, Issue 2 , Pages 127-137, June 2009

Results of four inter-laboratory comparisons provided by the Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (FIRMS) network

  • James F. Carter

      Affiliations

    • Mass Spec Analytical Ltd, Building 20F, Golf Course Lane, Filton, Bristol BS99 7AR, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 117 9368516; fax: +44 117 9368527.
  • ,
  • Jenny C. Hill

      Affiliations

    • Mass Spec Analytical Ltd, Building 20F, Golf Course Lane, Filton, Bristol BS99 7AR, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Sean Doyle

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Explosives Laboratory, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN14 7BP, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Claire Lock

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Explosives Laboratory, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN14 7BP, United Kingdom

Received 12 November 2008; received in revised form 19 December 2008; accepted 24 December 2008. published online 11 February 2009.

Abstract 

Between 2004 and 2008 the Forensic Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (FIRMS) network organised four Inter-Laboratory Camparison excercises with the aim of harmonising and validating isotopic measurements to be used for forensic applications.

The samples distributed comprised materials of potential forensic interest such as packaging and pharmaceuticals to be analysed for δ2H, δ13C, δ15N and δ18O composition. As many as 30 international laboratories participated in these comparisons. Results have shown overall improvements for both within- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with respect to δ13C and δ15N measurements.

Only a small number of laboratories returned results for δ2H and δ18O analysis and these results highlighted a need for improvement in the reproducibility of these measurements and a need to address the exchange of hydrogen between samples and ambient moisture. Results also highlighted the importance of sample preparation procedures and the need to standardise both these procedures and calibration against Standard Reference Materials. Future Inter-Laboratory Comparison exercises will assess the suitability of laboratories to submit data to national and international databases similar to those currently operated for fingerprints, DNA etc.

Keywords: Isotope ratio, Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS), Inter-laboratory comparison, Validation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1355-0306(08)00159-7

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2008.12.002

Science & Justice
Volume 49, Issue 2 , Pages 127-137, June 2009