Evaluation and professionalism

References 

1. H. Ognall, Any judge would do the same. The case against Colin Stagg was based on a single rotten plank. The Times, 19 December 2008. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5367901.ece.
2. D. Canter, We need smarter police who are science-savvy. The Times, 19 December 2008. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article5367133.ece.
3. Jackson G, Jones S, Booth G, Champod C, Evett IW. The nature of forensic science opinion — a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings. Science and Justice. 2006;46:33–44
4. Wright M. Focus on…forensic gait analysis. Journal of Homicide and Major Incident Investigation. 2008;4:83–95
5. Finkelstein MO, Fairley WB. A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review. 1970;84:489–517
6. Taroni F, Champod C, Margot P. Forerunners of Bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics. 1998;38:183–200
7. AFSP. Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion. Science and Justice 49 (3) (2009) xxx–xxx. doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.004.