Geophysics and the search of freshwater bodies: A review

References 

1. Haglund WD, Sorg MH. Advances in forensic taphonomy. In: Human Remains in Water Environments. 2001;p. 202–216Chapter 10
2. Nelson HH, McDonald JR. Multisensor towed array detection system for UXO detection. Geoscience & Remote Sensing. 2001;39:1139–1145
3. Snovak A. Barron's Guide to Search and Rescue Dogs. New York: Baron; 2004;
4. Hardisty J. Hydrodynamic modelling as investigative and evidential tools in murder enquiries: examples from the Humber and Thames. In:  Pye K,  Croft D editor. Forensic Geoscience: Principles, Techniques and Applications. Geological Society of London; 2003;3–4 March 2003
5. Ruffell A, McKinley J. Geoforensics. Chichester: Wiley & Son; 2008;288pp
6. Robinson DA, Binley A, Crook N, Day-Lewis DF, Ferre PA, Grauch VJS, et al. Advancing process-based watershed hydrological research using near-surface geophysics: a vision for, and review of, electrical and magnetic geophysical methods. Hydrological Processes. 2008;22:3604–3635
7. Kearey P, Brooks M, Hill I. Chapter 1: The Principles and Limitations of Exploration Methods' in An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. WileyBlackwell; 2002;
8. Vereecken H, Binley A, Cassiani G, Revil A, Titov K. In: Applied Hydrogeophsics, NATO Science Series, IV Earth and Environmental Sciences. vol. 71:Amsterdam: Springer; 2004;
9. Haeni FP. Application of continuous seismic-reflection methods to hydrologic studies. Ground Water. 1986;24(1):23–31
   • CrossRef
10. Hansen BP, Lapham WW. In: Geohydrology and simulated groundwater flow. Plymouth–Carver Aquifer, southeastern Massachusetts. US Geological Survey; 1992;WRIR 90-4204
11. Gorin SR, Haeni FP. In: Use of surface-geological methods to assess riverbed scour at bridge piers. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report. 1989;
12. Anselmetti F, Fuchs M, Beres M. Sedimentological Studies of Western Swiss Lakes with High Resolution Reflection Seismic and Amphibious GPR Profiling, 10th international conference on ground penetrating radar, 21st–24th June. The Netherlands: Delft; 2004;
13. Wilson BD, Madsen JA. Acoustical methods for bottom and sub-bottom imaging in estuaries: benthic mapping project to identify and map the bottom habitat and sub-bottom sediments of Delaware Bay. Sea Technologies. 2006;47(6):43–46
14. Xingxin X, et al. Case study: application of GPR to detection of hidden dangers to underwater hydraulic structures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2006;32:12–20
15. Dobinson A, McCann D. Application of marine seismic surveying methods to engineering geological studies in the near shore environment. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 1990;23:109–123
16. Boyd TM. Seismic Methods:Reflection and Refraction. In: Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. Colorado School of Mines; 2003;http://galitzin.mines.edu/INTROGP/notes_template.jsp?url=SEIS%2FNOTES%2Fsintro.html&page=Refraction%3A%20Notes%3A%20Method%20Overview, [last accessed 10/12/2008]
17. Hassani F, Guevremont P, Momayez M, Sdari A, Saleh K. Application of non-destructive evaluation techniques on concrete dams. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mineral Science. 1997;34:3–4
18. Enviroscan. Seismic Refraction Versus Seismic Reflection. 2003;http://www.enviroscan.com/html/seismic_refraction_versus_refl.html, last accessed 10/12/2008
19. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Chapter 8: Geophysical Techniques' in Field Sampling Procedures Manual. 2005;http://www.state.nj.us/dep/srp/guidance/fspm/pdf/fsmp2005.pdf, last accessed 29/01/09
20. Fitzgerald D, Zarillo G, Johnston S. Recent developments in the geomorphic investigations of engineered tidal inlets. Coastal Engineering Journal. 2003;45(4):565–600
21. Gutowski M, Bull J, Dix J, Henstock T, Hogarth P, Hiller T, et al. Three-dimensional high resolution acoustic imaging of the sub-seabed. Journal of Applied Acoustics. 2008;68:412–421
22. Cha YH, Jo C, Suh H. Water bottom seismic refraction survey for engineering applications. Geosystems Engineering. 2003;6:40–45
23. Teledyne Benthos, 2007, Teledyne Benthos Undersea Systems and Equipment, http://www.benthos.com/ [last accessed 29/01/09]
24. Lafferty B, Quinn R, Breen C. A side-scan sonar and high resolution Chirp sub-bottom profile study of the natural and anthropogenic sedimentary record of Lower Lough Erne, northwestern Ireland. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2005;33:756–766
25. Kendal B. An overview of the development and introduction of ground radar to 1945. Journal of Navigation. 2003;56(3):343–352
26. Daniels J. In: Ground Penetrating Radar Fundamentals. U.S.EPA Report, Appendix 1–21. 2000;
27. Huisman JA, Hubbard SS, Redman JD, Annan AP. Measuring soil and water content with ground penetrating radar: a review. Vadose Zone Journal. 2003;2:476–491
28. Knight R. Ground penetrating radar for environmental applications. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science. 2001;29:229–255
29. Conyers L, Goodman D. Ground Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists. USA: Altamira Press; 1997;
30. Davis JL, Annan AP. Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophysical Prospecting. 1989;37:531–551
31. Gruber, S., and Ludwig, F., 1996. Application of Ground Penetrating Radar in Glaciology and Ground Frost Prospecting [unpublished]
32. Jol HM, Bristow CS. GPR in sediments: advice on data collection, basic processing and interpretation, a good practice guide. In:  Bristow CS,  Jol HM editor. Ground Penetrating Radar in Sediments. vol. 211:London: Geological Society; 2003;p. 9–27Special Publications
33. Ruffell A. Underwater scene investigation using GPR in the search for a sunken jet ski, Northern Ireland. Journal of Science and Justice. 2006;
34. Forde MC, McCann DM, Clark MR, Broughton KJ, Fenning PJ, Brown A. Radar measurement of bridge scour. NDT&E International. 1999;32:481–492
35. Pope J, Lewis RD, Welp T. In: Beach and Underwater Occurrences of Ordance at a Former Defence Site/; Erie Army Depot, Ohio, Army Corps of Engineers CERC Report 96-1. 1996;
36. Costa JE, Spicer KR, Cheng RT, Haeni FP, Melcher NB, Thurman EM, et al. Measuring stream discharge by non-contact methods—a proof-of-concept experiment. Geophysical Research Letters. 2000;27:553–556
37. Hall ET. The use of the proton magnetometer in underwater archaeology. Archaeometry. 1966;9:32–44
38. Nelson H, McDonald J. Multisensor towed array detection system for UXO detection. IEEE Transactions Geoscience and Remote Sensing. June 2001;39:1139–1145
39. Bowen Z, Waltermire R. Evaluation of Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) for measuring river corridor topography. Journal of American Water Resources Association. 2002;38:33–41
40. Wang C, Philpot W. In: Using SHOALS LIDAR system to detect bottom material change. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. vol. 5:2002;p. 2690–2692
41. Pe'eri S, Philpot W. In: Increasing the existence of very shallow-water LIDAR measurements using the red-channel waveforms. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. vol. 45:2007;p. 1217–1223
42. Alaimo M. In: Family finds Myrtle Creek drowning victim. News Review Today, Tuesday, May 27th, 2003. 2003;http://www.nrtoday.com/article/20030527/NEWS/105270001&parentprofile=search
43. Sjöström T. Searching for a sunken snowmobile in an arctic lake! Mala Geoscience Newsletter, 2002. 2002;www.malags.se/snowmobile
44. Reynolds JM. The role of environmental geophysics in the investigation of an acid tar lagoon, Llwyneinion, North Wales, UK. First Break. 2002;20:630–636
45. Parker R, McKinley JM, Ruffell A. Application of ground-penetrating radar to shallow freshwater bodies for forensic search. In: 15th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. 2009;Conference Abstract. http://www.eage.org/events/index.php?eventid=110&Opendivs=s3
46. Ruffell A, Donnelly LJ, Dawson L. The future of geoforensics. Geoscientsists at crime scenes. In: Geological Society of London, 17th December, 2008 Conference Abstract. 2008;http://www.stratascan.co.uk/pdf/EIGG/Forensic%20Geoscience%20Group%20Programme.pdf