Journal Home
Search for

Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 18-22 (March 2010)


View previous. 6 of 81 View next.

Trace evidence: Here today, gone tomorrow?

James RobertsonaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Claude Rouxb

Received 18 November 2009; accepted 23 November 2009. published online 23 December 2009.

Abstract 

The recent report of the National Research Council of the US National Academies “Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: a Path Forward” found evidence that the level of scientific development and evaluation varies substantially among the forensic science disciplines. In this paper the status of trace evidence will be reviewed from an international perspective with particular reference to case studies. The paper will argue that the trace evidence discipline needs to learn from past experience and that serious coordinated action is required at an international level if trace evidence is to continue to meet the standards expected of forensic science in the future. The paper concludes that it is vital that trace evidence remains a key component of forensic investigation due to its important role in addressing the ‘what happened’ question.

a Forensic and Data Centres, Australian Federal Police, GPO Box 401, ACT, 2601, Australia

b Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

 Paper presented at 5th Triennial Conference of the European Academy of Forensic Science, Glasgow, 8–11 September 2009.

PII: S1355-0306(09)00177-4

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.11.005


View previous. 6 of 81 View next.