The good, the bad, the ugly: The NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America

References 

1. P. Williams, Crime labs are seriously deficient, report says: National Academy of Science says only DNA evidence is dependable, MSNBC, Feb. 18, 2009, available at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29258576/ (last visited Jan. 20, 2010).
2. Crime labs and dismal science, National Public Radio On Point, Feb. 19, 2009, available at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29258576/ (last visited Jan. 20, 2010).
3. M. Neil, Crime labs in disarray nationally; reform, independence needed, report says, A.B.A.J. L. News Now, Feb. 18, 2009, http://abajournal.com/news/crime_labs_in_disarray_nationally_reform_neded_report_says/ (last visited Mar. 1, 2009).
4. J. L. Mnookin, Clueless ‘science,’ Los Angeles Times, Feb.19, 2009 (last visited Mar. 1, 2009).
5. The National Academies, Project Information, http://www8.nationalacademies.org/cp/projectview.aspx?key=48741 (last visited Mar. 1, 2009).
6. National Research Council Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: a Path Forward. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press; 2009;
7. Schultz OT, Morgan EM. The. Coroner and the Medical Examiner, Bull. No. 64. In: Washington, D. C: National Research Council; 1928;
8. National Research Council Committee on Evaluation of Sound Spectrograms. On the Theory and Practice of Voice Identification. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1979;
9. National Research Council Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science. DNA Technology in Forensic Science. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1992;
10. Kaye David H. The Double Helix and the Law of Evidence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2010;
11. National Research Council Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science: An Update. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 1996;
12. National Research Council Committee on Scientific Assessment of Bullet Lead Elemental Composition Comparison. Forensic Analysis: Weighing Bullet Lead Evidence. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2004;
13. John Solomon, FBI's Forensic Test Full of Holes, Washington Post, November 18, 2007.
14. FBI, Press Release: National Academy of Sciences Releases FBI-commissioned Study on Bullet Lead Analysis, February 10, 2004, available at http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel04/bullet021004.htm.
15. National Research Council Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2003;
16. Federal Register, Sept. 29, 2006, 57386–57397 (Counterintelligence Evaluation Regulations, 10 Code of Federal Regulations 709–710).
17. Giannelli Paul C. Fabricated reports. Criminal Justice. 2002;16:49
18. Kaye David H. Identification, individualization and uniqueness: What's the difference?. Law, Probability and Risk. 2009;8:85–94
19. Kaye David H, Bernstein D, Mnookin J. The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence: Expert Evidence. New York: Aspen Pub. Co.; 2004;
20. David H. Kaye, Probability, individualization, and uniqueness in forensic science evidence: Listening to the academies, Brooklyn Law Review 75 (4) (2010).
21. Haack Susan. An epistemologist in the bramble-bush: At the supreme court with Mr. Joiner. Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2001;26:217–248
22. Joseph Polski, Forensic science: A critical concern for police chiefs, From The Police Chief, vol. LXXVI, no. 9, September 2009, available at http://policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.cfm?fuseaction=display_arch&article_id=1887&issue_id=92009.
23. Federal and Uniform Rule of Evidence 702.
24. Dean Gialamas and Beth Greene, Letter to Senator Patrick Leahy, March 17, 2009, available at http://www.ascld.org/files/releases/090317%20ASCLD%20Letter%20to%20Congress%20FINAL.pdf.
25. In: ASCLD's Comments on the Release of the NAS Report on Forensic Science. 2009;February 19, 2009, available at http://www.ascld.org/files/releases/ASCLD%20NAS%20Comments%20090219.pdf
26. United States v. Baines, 573 F.3d 979 (10th Cir. 2009).
27. United States v. Mouzone, Crim. No. WDQ-08-086, 2009 WL 3617748 (D. Md. Oct. 29, 2009).