Science & Justice
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 204-208, December 2011

Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation

  • Itiel E. Dror

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London (UCL), London, UK
    • Cognitive Consultants International (CCI), London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    web address
  • ,
  • Greg Hampikian

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Biology and Criminal Justice, Boise State University, USA

Received 30 July 2010; received in revised form 30 July 2011; accepted 4 August 2011. published online 05 September 2011.

Abstract 

The objectivity of forensic science decision making has received increased attention and scrutiny. However, there are only a few published studies experimentally addressing the potential for contextual bias. Because of the esteem of DNA evidence, it is important to study and assess the impact of subjectivity and bias on DNA mixture interpretation. The study reported here presents empirical data suggesting that DNA mixture interpretation is subjective. When 17 North American expert DNA examiners were asked for their interpretation of data from an adjudicated criminal case in that jurisdiction, they produced inconsistent interpretations. Furthermore, the majority of 'context free' experts disagreed with the laboratory's pre-trial conclusions, suggesting that the extraneous context of the criminal case may have influenced the interpretation of the DNA evidence, thereby showing a biasing effect of contextual information in DNA mixture interpretation.

Keywords: Human cognition, Bias, Forensic decision making, Contextual influences, DNA interpretation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 One sentence summary: DNA mixture interpretation is subjective and may be susceptible to bias by extraneous context, as evidenced by conflicting conclusions concerning the inclusion or exclusion of suspects.

PII: S1355-0306(11)00096-7

doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004

Science & Justice
Volume 51, Issue 4 , Pages 204-208, December 2011