Elsevier

Science & Justice

Volume 51, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 204-208
Science & Justice

Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The objectivity of forensic science decision making has received increased attention and scrutiny. However, there are only a few published studies experimentally addressing the potential for contextual bias. Because of the esteem of DNA evidence, it is important to study and assess the impact of subjectivity and bias on DNA mixture interpretation. The study reported here presents empirical data suggesting that DNA mixture interpretation is subjective. When 17 North American expert DNA examiners were asked for their interpretation of data from an adjudicated criminal case in that jurisdiction, they produced inconsistent interpretations. Furthermore, the majority of 'context free' experts disagreed with the laboratory's pre-trial conclusions, suggesting that the extraneous context of the criminal case may have influenced the interpretation of the DNA evidence, thereby showing a biasing effect of contextual information in DNA mixture interpretation.

References (30)

  • I.E. Dror et al.

    When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints

    Applied Cognitive Psychology

    (2005)
  • NAS

    Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward

    (2009)
  • I.E. Dror et al.

    Why experts make errors

    Journal of Forensic Identification

    (2006)
  • I.E. Dror et al.

    Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of fingerprint experts' decision making

    Journal of Forensic Sciences

    (2008)
  • I.E. Dror et al.

    The vision in ‘blind’ justice: expert perception, judgment and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition

    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

    (2010)
  • Cited by (243)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    One sentence summary: DNA mixture interpretation is subjective and may be susceptible to bias by extraneous context, as evidenced by conflicting conclusions concerning the inclusion or exclusion of suspects.

    View full text